Agencies
Run on public record: Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Agency, Solicitation 2023-07

The RFP engine

Our system read a 151-page state advertising solicitation and drafted the response, trained on the agency's own published work.

151
Pages in the solicitation
151
Pages in the solicitation
Sept 9, 2024
Issue date, public record
~90
Pages of requirements needing written answers
14
Creative-scope subsections drafted

An RFP costs you a week you never bill.

Most agencies chasing public and enterprise RFPs run the same play. Someone senior clears their calendar, reads the whole document, builds the compliance map by hand, and then writes ninety pages of requirement answers in the last four days. The strategy that wins the work gets whatever hours are left over.

How it works.

One system, calibrated to one agency's own writing, carries the compliance read and the first full draft, so the team spends that week on the thinking instead of the typing. It does not go looking for RFPs. You bring the ones you want to win.

You feed it the direction and the narrative you want to run for that pursuit. That part stays yours, every time. Where a fact lives only inside your shop, the draft marks the slot rather than inventing something.

The system reads all 151 pages, returns the compliance map, and drafts the response, the same day it gets the document.

We ran it on a real one.

Maryland Lottery and Gaming Control Agency, Solicitation 2023-07: the 151-page advertising RFP issued September 9, 2024. We chose it on purpose, because it is public, it was actually won, and the winning and losing prices are on the record. Anyone can check the output against what really happened.

The system read the solicitation and drafted the agency response with no access to any agency's materials.

The system produced the compliance read across all 151 pages and the writing spine of a full Volume I response: executive summary, understanding and approach, all fourteen creative-scope subsections, work plan, staffing frame, experience, and the required affirmations.

That RFP penalizes thin answers by name. Roughly ninety pages of requirements each need a real written response. That is the load this carries.

We train it on your documentation.

Every install starts with your material. We read what your shop has already written and pull out the structure underneath it: how you open, how you answer a requirement, the registers your reviewers expect, the claims you stand behind. That extraction is the work, and it is the part a generic tool cannot do.

What we read
  • Your winning proposals, and the losing ones, which teach as much
  • Your roster, references, billings, and boilerplate
  • Your past performance record
  • The solicitation itself, every page of it
What comes back
  • The compliance map: structure, hard gates, scoring, deadlines
  • The full writing spine of a response, section by section
  • Your voice, because it was built from your writing
  • Marked slots where only your shop has the answer, never invented

What it costs.

$5,000

To install and calibrate the system on your agency's own file of past proposals. Ongoing support is quoted per agency depending on volume.

The first run happens on a real RFP you are actually chasing. We run it, you read the output, and anything that does not come back the way you need, we fix.

Pitch is the live tool.

The richer your library, the closer the draft.

Open Pitch